<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Letter to Steve Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.micklerandassociates.com/a-letter-to-steve-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.micklerandassociates.com/a-letter-to-steve-jobs/</link>
	<description>Vancouver, WA &#38; Portland, OR IT &#38; Computer Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:29:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Mickler, MCSE &#124; CISSP</title>
		<link>http://www.micklerandassociates.com/a-letter-to-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Mickler, MCSE &#124; CISSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickler.workshedhosting.com/a-letter-to-steve-jobs/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Hey Francesca - thanks for reading.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;YES, I heard about the suit filed by Cisco yesterday over the iPhone name. And I think you illustrate my point exactly: Apple Inc, in my opinion, is in danger of losing its core identity as a quality niche market computer manufacturer as to build a global empire of mobile media. Dangerous because, just as you said, the iPod and its ilk are &quot;toys&quot; - not as serious a machine as you, a core customer, as compared to your iMac. Dangerous waters, in my opinion, if you are an investor or a Macophile.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Francesca &#8211; thanks for reading.</p>
<p>YES, I heard about the suit filed by Cisco yesterday over the iPhone name. And I think you illustrate my point exactly: Apple Inc, in my opinion, is in danger of losing its core identity as a quality niche market computer manufacturer as to build a global empire of mobile media. Dangerous because, just as you said, the iPod and its ilk are &#8220;toys&#8221; &#8211; not as serious a machine as you, a core customer, as compared to your iMac. Dangerous waters, in my opinion, if you are an investor or a Macophile.</p>
<p>R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.micklerandassociates.com/a-letter-to-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickler.workshedhosting.com/a-letter-to-steve-jobs/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Interesting take.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I tend to agree and was hoping that the keynote speech would be more about something note-worthy like some great improvement in OS X 10.5&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To me, Apple Computers Inc. &lt;b&gt;IS&lt;/b&gt; the Mac OS, not the iEverything nor the funky looking sleek computer cases.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And even though the best thing to come out of Apple is really a product of NeXT engineers (the Unix based OS X) that is still what Apple is about.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My home computer is a re-built non-firewire second generation orange i-Mac that was discarded by a previous employer and upgraded with scavanged parts so that now it&#039;s running OS X 10.4 on harware that Apple says won&#039;t even load it!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So yes, I think OS X is great but all this iPod iPhone stuff... that&#039;s just toys, there&#039;s nothing really noteworthy there.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;By the way, isn&#039;t iPhone a trademark of Cisco?&lt;br/&gt;http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/the-iphone-arrives-via-cisco.asp&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Francesca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take.</p>
<p>I tend to agree and was hoping that the keynote speech would be more about something note-worthy like some great improvement in OS X 10.5</p>
<p>To me, Apple Computers Inc. <b>IS</b> the Mac OS, not the iEverything nor the funky looking sleek computer cases.</p>
<p>And even though the best thing to come out of Apple is really a product of NeXT engineers (the Unix based OS X) that is still what Apple is about.</p>
<p>My home computer is a re-built non-firewire second generation orange i-Mac that was discarded by a previous employer and upgraded with scavanged parts so that now it&#8217;s running OS X 10.4 on harware that Apple says won&#8217;t even load it!</p>
<p>So yes, I think OS X is great but all this iPod iPhone stuff&#8230; that&#8217;s just toys, there&#8217;s nothing really noteworthy there.</p>
<p>By the way, isn&#8217;t iPhone a trademark of Cisco?<br /><a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/the-iphone-arrives-via-cisco.asp" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/the-iphone-arrives-via-cisco.asp</a></p>
<p>Francesca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

